South Sudan, as a young nation, faces numerous challenges in achieving structural transformation, including low productivity and a lack of skilled labor. In the short term, financing structural transformation requires a focus on enhancing domestic revenue mobilization and improving the efficiency of public spending. This would create fiscal space for investments in key growth drivers. In the medium to long term, attention could shift toward debt restructuring, benefiting from reforms to the G20 Common Framework, particularly in ensuring equitable treatment of creditors. Additionally, access to risk-sharing instruments could help attract private investment and finance, which are crucial for long-term development.
However, a lack of comprehensive political analysis has contributed to the economic challenges that South Sudan faces, with limited strategic planning by its leadership. Regional economic integration offers advantages such as the free movement of goods and services among member states and open employment opportunities without discrimination based on nationality. While this integration is beneficial for South Sudan’s neighbors, who have developed skilled labor over decades, it presents challenges for South Sudanese workers, who are still in the early stages of skills development and have less competitive experience.
This situation calls for a thoughtful approach from South Sudan’s leadership. Leaders must weigh the advantages and disadvantages for their citizens when engaging in regional agreements. For South Sudan, a focus on building technical skills, enhancing agricultural production, promoting industrialization, and advancing technology is essential to boost economic growth and foster political stability. With a long-term vision, South Sudan can overcome its current challenges and secure a prosperous future for its people.
Economic Integration
The concept of regional economic integration can be highly beneficial when member states are at similar levels of development in areas such as production capacities, labor market skills, and other structural factors. Regional integration helps countries address divisions that hinder the smooth flow of goods, services, capital, people, and ideas—divisions that can constrain economic growth, particularly in developing nations. These barriers, often caused by geography, inadequate infrastructure, and inefficient policies, can slow progress. Regional integration allows countries to overcome these challenges by connecting goods, services, and markets, thereby promoting the free flow of trade, capital, energy, people, and ideas.
Successful regional integration requires collaboration in key areas such as:
Trade, investment, and domestic regulation.
Transport, ICT, and energy infrastructure.
Macroeconomic and financial policies.
The provision of common public goods, such as shared natural resources, security, and education.
Such cooperation can take different forms, depending on the region, with varying levels of policy commitment and shared sovereignty, tailored to specific priorities.
The potential economic gains from regional integration are significant. By working together, countries can:
Improve market efficiency.
Share the costs of public goods or large infrastructure projects.
Formulate policies cooperatively, using integration as a framework for reforms.
Build a foundation for global integration.
Enjoy non-economic benefits such as peace and security.
However, there are also risks that need to be carefully managed. Countries may have different priorities or preferences when it comes to regional integration, influenced by factors such as connectivity gaps, economic geography, or the desire to maintain sovereignty in certain areas. Additionally, the effects of regional integration on trade, investment flows, economic activity, growth, and income distribution can be challenging to predict and assess.
In conclusion, while regional integration offers substantial opportunities for economic and social progress, it is essential that these efforts are tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of each participating country to ensure equitable and sustainable benefits for all.
East African Policies.
The absence of adequate complementary policies and institutions can lead to unintended and inefficient outcomes in regional integration. For example, policy barriers at national borders may counteract the potential benefits of cooperation in areas such as transport infrastructure. Moreover, regional integration often creates both winners and losers, even within individual countries. As such, it is crucial to implement policies and build institutions that ensure inclusivity and effectively manage social, environmental, and governance risks.
In the case of South Sudan, regional economic integration has had significant negative effects on the country’s economy. Historically, South Sudan has relied heavily on oil revenues, alongside non-oil revenues such as visa taxes, goods and commodities taxes, and work permit fees as primary sources of income. However, regional integration, which aims to remove barriers between member states, has adversely impacted South Sudan’s economy. Approximately 80% of the foreign workforce now comes from regional member states, and 90% of goods and commodities are imported from these same states. Previously, South Sudan benefited from taxes and work permit fees collected from foreign workers and imports. With these barriers removed, the country is left with a reduced revenue stream, primarily from oil, which has also been negatively affected by the ongoing conflict in Sudan.
Additionally, South Sudanese workers hold only a minimal share of international jobs, with an estimated 0.2% contributing to the national economy. There is also uncertainty regarding the government’s ability to effectively track and monitor the contributions of its citizens working abroad, which could indirectly support the economy. This highlights a gap in the country’s capacity to establish systems for tracking and leveraging the economic contributions of its diaspora.
On the other hand, regional member states have seen positive impacts from regional integration, benefiting from increased access to South Sudan’s markets and employment opportunities. While regional integration offers significant benefits, it also underscores the need for South Sudan to develop strategies that enhance its competitiveness and ensure sustainable economic growth within the framework of integration.
In conclusion, regional economic integration presents both challenges and opportunities. For South Sudan to fully benefit from the process, it is essential to address these challenges through strategic policy reforms and the development of institutions that promote inclusivity and economic resilience.
Economic Integration
The East African Community (EAC) economic integration has had a positive impact on trade among its member states, contributing to a significant expansion of exports valued at USD 14 billion, with 22.4% of these exports linked to intra-EAC trade. This has supported an average annual economic growth rate of 6.5%. Trade within and between EAC countries has increased due to the harmonization of policies and the reduction of tariff barriers, which decreased from 26.1% in 1994 to 9.2% in 2011. This regional collaboration has positioned the EAC’s economic growth as one of the best in Sub-Saharan Africa.
The share of trade in GDP has also seen growth, with imports rising from 21% in 2000 to 28% in 2015, and exports increasing from 13% to 18% during the same period. Uganda has been a major beneficiary of this integration, experiencing a trade growth rate of 3.4%, with total trade valued at $1.24 billion. Between 2001 and 2009, Uganda’s exports surged by 26%, and imports doubled from USD 288 billion to USD 547 billion.
The EAC’s economic integration has positively influenced bilateral trade among its member states and was specifically designed to deepen political, economic, social, and cultural ties. It aims to improve the quality of life for the people of East Africa through enhanced value-added production, competitiveness, trade, and investment. These values are central to the EAC’s vision of a competitive, prosperous, stable, politically united, and secure region.
While this integration promotes political unity, which could be valuable in times of regional instability, there are concerns about whether the benefits fully extend to countries like South Sudan. Some may view regional military interventions during political unrest as reflective of authoritarian tendencies, rather than providing tangible benefits to citizens.
Africa, in comparison to other regions, remains home to a relatively low proportion of intra-regional trade globally. However, one of the key advantages of economic integration is the reduction of tariffs or the facilitation of free trade among participating countries. In the long run, integration can promote economic growth by increasing competition, expanding market size, boosting investment, and achieving economies of scale. The heightened competition also encourages countries to produce higher-quality goods, enhancing their ability to compete both within the region and globally.
While the EAC’s integration has undoubtedly fostered growth and improved trade among its members, the full extent of its impact both positive and negative on trade and global competitiveness remains a subject of ongoing assessment. It is essential to continue evaluating whether these benefits are distributed equitably across all member states, including South Sudan, to ensure that the integration achieves its goals for the region as a whole.
The Republic of South Sudan should prioritize improving its physical infrastructure to enhance its competitiveness. Addressing key challenges such as insecurity and criminality along major transport corridors, simplifying the complex taxation system, strengthening trade-related institutions and regulatory frameworks, and upholding the rule of law are essential steps toward sustainable development. Regional cooperation in enforcing the rule of law is crucial for achieving peace and stability, which are prerequisites for any meaningful development. Since the causes and consequences of violent conflict often transcend national borders, a regional approach is widely recognized as critical to ensuring both regional and global security. Only with peace and stability can regional integration drive economic development.
In a nutshell, the government should focus on agriculture, mining, and services sectors as potential engines of growth, with the aim of positioning South Sudan as a vibrant and diverse exporter in the region. To effectively assess South Sudan’s export competitiveness, it is necessary to first understand the country’s overall economic competitiveness and its role in supporting the growth of the export sector. Establishing the “building blocks” for a healthy competitive environment is key to empowering the private sector to produce and deliver quality goods and services to international markets at competitive prices. These efforts will ensure long-term economic viability and sustainable development for South Sudan.
References
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2013). The State of Industrial Development in Africa. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/presspb2013d1_en.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2020.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Water Drives Job Creation and Economic Growth, Says New UN Report. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/water-drives-job-creation-and-economic-growth-says-new-report. Accessed 13 April 2021.
South Sudan Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Cooperatives and Rural Development & Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Industries. (2015). Comprehensive Agricultural Development Master Plan Final Report, Annex IV: Situation Analysis Report 2013/2015. Retrieved from https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12233656_01.pdf. Accessed 29 September 2020.
Observatory of Economic Complexity. South Sudan. Retrieved from https://oec.world/en/profile/country/ssd. Accessed 12 December 2020.
International Labour Organization. (2018a). The Employment Impact of Climate Change Adaptation: Input Document for the G20 Climate Sustainability Working Group. Geneva. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_645572.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2020.
International Labour Organization. (2018b). World Employment and Social Outlook 2018.
African Development Bank. (2020). South Sudan Economic Outlook. Retrieved from www.afdb.org/en/countries/east-africa/south-sudan/south-sudan-economic-outlook.
Source link : https://ozarab.media/urgent-appeal-to-lawmakers-revisiting-south-sudans-economic-integration-amid-regional-vulnerabilities/
Author :
Publish date : 2024-10-02 23:50:27
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.