Selection of oranges. Credit: Richard Newstead / Getty Images
South Africa is asking the World Trade Organization (WTO) to set up dispute panels to review European Union measures affecting the import of South African citrus fruit.
Pretoria and Brussels have been at loggerheads for months over the EU’s decision to impose phytosanitary trade regulations on South African citrus fruit because of fears over the spread of citrus black spot (CBS), a fungal infection that affects the produce.
South Africa is unhappy that the EU, a major market for its citrus fruit,
is enforcing measures on its citrus growers, including a detailed spray programme and inspections at orchards and packhouses. The South African government says the precautions are unnecessary and impose significant financial burdens for its citrus industry.
However, an attempt to resolve the issue at the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body (DSB), “did not resolve in a mutually agreed solution”, according to the Switzerland-based trade disagreement resolution organisation.
Now South Africa has called on the WTO to establish two dispute panels to review the EU measures.
This is the first time that South Africa has requested the establishment of a panel under the WTO’s dispute settlement system.
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles
on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
View profiles in store
Company Profile – free
sample
Your download email will arrive shortly
We are confident about the
unique
quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most
beneficial
decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by
submitting the below form
By GlobalData
Country *
UK
USA
Afghanistan
Åland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint
Eustatius
and
Saba
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean
Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Democratic Republic
of
the Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Côte d”Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curaçao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern
Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard Island and
McDonald
Islands
Holy See
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
North Korea
South Korea
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao
Macedonia,
The
Former
Yugoslav Republic of
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Réunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint
Helena,
Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and
The
Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South
Georgia
and The South
Sandwich Islands
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard and Jan Mayen
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
US Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
British Virgin Islands
US Virgin Islands
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Kosovo
Industry *
Academia & Education
Aerospace, Defense &
Security
Agriculture
Asset Management
Automotive
Banking & Payments
Chemicals
Construction
Consumer
Foodservice
Government, trade bodies
and NGOs
Health & Fitness
Hospitals & Healthcare
HR, Staffing &
Recruitment
Insurance
Investment Banking
Legal Services
Management Consulting
Marketing & Advertising
Media & Publishing
Medical Devices
Mining
Oil & Gas
Packaging
Pharmaceuticals
Power & Utilities
Private Equity
Real Estate
Retail
Sport
Technology
Telecom
Transportation &
Logistics
Travel, Tourism &
Hospitality
Venture Capital
Tick here to opt out of curated industry news, reports, and event updates from Just Food.
Submit and
download
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
At the meeting at the WTO on Monday (24 June), South Africa argued that the EU measures are not based on scientific principles, are maintained without sufficient scientific evidence and are more trade-restrictive than necessary to achieve the EU’s appropriate level of protection.
It also said the EU failed to account for regional differences with regards to pest risk in the application of the measures.
It added that the measures are having a severe impact on South Africa’s citrus exports, which provide jobs to more than 140,000 people in the country.
It did say, however, that it is open to continued talks with the EU in order to secure a mutually agreed solution.
In its turn, the EU said it regretted South Africa’s decision to pursue panel proceedings in the two cases but maintained that its pest control measures are entirely justified and that it would succeed in any dispute proceedings.
It said that it was not ready in Monday’s meeting to agree to the requests for panels from South Africa.
Just Food asked the EU for further comment relating to South Africa’s request for the establishment of review panels.
Olof Gill, a spokesperson for traade and agriculture at the Europeaan Commission, said: “The EU is convinced that its measures are compatible with international rules and are necessary to prevent the significant damage that these pests could do to plant health and our farming economy in the EU.
“The EU regrets that South Africa has reverted to dispute settlement.
“The EU will enter into consultations with South Africa in good faith and stands ready to discuss these issues with South Africa.”
In April, Spain’s Citrus Management Committee accused South Africa of using “threats and blackmail” towards the EU.
The organisation representing Spanish citrus fruit growers said the idea that the citrus black spot cannot be transmitted through fruit is “either a half-truth or an outright falsehood”.
It added: “This is blackmail, a threatening and dissuasive action to stop the [European] Commission from requiring the effective fungicides they should already be using.”
Sign up for our daily news round-up!
Source link : https://www.just-food.com/news/south-africa-seeks-wto-action-after-citrus-fruit-row-talks-with-eu-stall/
Author :
Publish date : 2024-06-26 12:02:05
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.